The Great Fallacy Ending the Judeo-Christian West

Government cannot perform Effectively, Efficiently and Economically for a reason: Government by definition must conflate multiple, often competing interests. That requires successive compromises and compromise is the enemy of effectiveness, efficiency and economy. But accomplishing those compromises in a generally acceptable manner is the purpose of human government. Put another way, government is humanity’s tool to optimize social behavior. When it imposes its selected behaviors, it crosses the line into tyranny. Leading society toward improved behaviors is for other, non-governmental institutions.

As of 2020, it is the great fallacy of much of the world that the purpose of government is the well-being of society, that well-being implicitly to be defined by government. That view seems an inevitable result of the spread of democratic governments wherein politicians compete in bribing voters with promises of benefits at the expense of others.  Pursued, that produces an all-encompassing government, resulting in a nearly totally politicized society. As is currently visible, such conditions are antipathetic to Judeo-Christian morals and intolerant of competing beliefs, which tend to be crowded out as government expands, increasing its dominance. President Ronald Reagan famously said that government is not the solution; government is the problem. He was correct; to believe that a process politically compromising competing interests can simultaneously optimize those interests seems absurd on its face and even more so in a universe where nothing is free..

Solutions for social problems must proceed from the society affected; they should not be politicized, misbegotten impositions such as we see today when a biological male wins female athletic honors by claiming that he identifies as female. Though that is admittedly an extreme example, it is nevertheless a cogent support for the idea that government, along with fire and money, makes a good servant but a poor master. President Reagan’s indictment arises from the reality that human government necessarily proceeds from human nature; it is an expression of human DNA.

Human government is, like the human nature that produces it, conflicted since it must recognize the conflicting interests representing a society of competitive individuals whose advancement rests upon combining efforts. The reality is expressed in the following axioms:



  • Humanity cannot expect to maximize outcomes for everyone.
  • Humanity needs to maximize outcomes for the species.
  • But humans need to maximize outcomes individually.
  • Therefore, the species must strive for the most generous average individual outcomes and
  • Individuals should accept that, but often do not.



  • Government is contested among individuals seeking improved outcomes.
  • Policies balance between the minimum outcomes acceptable to governors and governed.
  • Available surplus is appropriated by the governors firs; accrues to the governed second.
  • Any deficit is charged to the governed first, the governors second.

None of these axioms are altered by the design of the system of government in use, though their effects may be skewed. (They all proceed from human DNA, or if you are Judeo-Christian, from God.)

In America, the Judeo-Christian liberals who founded the United States used their Declaration of Independence to advertise a hierarchy: God, His created people and only then their government, dependent upon their consent. The structure erected by the U.S. Constitution sits on that foundation; without it, much of its meaning is lost and with it, most of its safeguards for liberty.

To become the arbiter and enforcer of societal well-being, government must dethrone God and reduce his people to servants, reversing the founding hierarchy. That is the direction of America and much of today’s recently Judeo-Christian West.

About Jack Curtis

Suspicious of government, doubtful of economics, fond of figure skating (but the off-ice part, not so much) Couple of degrees in government, a few medals in figure skating; just reading and suspicion for economics ...
This entry was posted in Goverrnment, Politics, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to The Great Fallacy Ending the Judeo-Christian West

  1. Particularly like your last paragraph. Two standard ploys of rulers is to conflate their own personal interests with that of the state; the other is to de-throne God by claiming to be god – as in ancient times and the “divine right of kings”. Both delegitimise opponents and criticism ascribing absolute power to themselves. Which is interesting, not only politically but morally and religiously. Assuming that the Divine exists, and is superior, where spiritually does that place someone who claims to be greater? Evidently, at the least, they do not respect authority. Morally, likewise. Politically, suggestive of being frauds/con artists and criminals. Democracy acknowledging its faults desists from making such outrageous claims.

    • Eleanor curtis says:

      “Le etat, c’est moi!” …But old King Louis isn’t holding up the universe – or these days, much else. But our species still reliably produces a supply of compulsive authoritarians, some of whom make it into power. Uncomfortably, perhaps that’s the system?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s