Sound The Alarm! The Swiss Are Controlling Their Border! (Who Do They Think It BelongsTo, Anyway?)

 

Undocumented Huns, Immigrating ...

Undocumented Huns, Immigrating …

Norway, we are told, may follow the Swiss on immigration. As the Swiss have just voted (narrowly) for immigration quotas, we are told disapprovingly. The E.U. neighbors of the Swiss are huddling over what to do about this, as if the little country were any of their business. But as we hear that some E.U. countries are threatening Israel with boycotts if it does not cave to the ‘Palestinians’, we aren’t surprised by the attitude. Our species has always been gifted with the ability to tell others what to do.

Immigration is a presently hot potato in both European and North American politics. Generally, the political leaders, who obtain various benefits from immigrants, want relatively open borders while ordinary citizens who pay the costs of immigrants, want various limits on their arrival. The “Y’all come!” leaders disapprove of the (ignorant, selfish, racist, etc.) attitudes of their voters but have so far failed to change them. It’s perhaps because the voters must live with realities the leaders ignore?

Americans at least at one time, made much of the idea of “peaceful enjoyment of their private property.” The U.S. Founders even inserted that idea into the American Constitution. It’s a very English idea, though King George III wasn’t perceived as sufficiently careful of it as the Founders thought he should have been. So they enshrined it in their New World.

If you are entitled to property, you must have the right to exclude any intruders whose presence you don’t desire, no? And if you can exclude from your property, then all of you ought to be able to exclude from your country. When a large enough number of uninvited arrivals appear, we call it invasion, do we not? And all agree we have a right to repel it if we can. And who, if not the residents, has the right to decide how many is too many? But in present Europe and North America, “leaders” have assumed that decision.

In the U.S, Democrats receive the majority of votes from the Hispanics who dominate the influx. Republicans depend upon the donations from large enterprises that rely upon cheap labor supplied by that same group. But taxpayers fund the costs of their presence in schools, hospitals, public housing and prisons. And they compete at the bottom of the labor pool. Perhaps as annoying or more so, they speak another language and have been led by American politicians to expect that limitation to be serviced at public expense in both conversation and documents. Probably most annoying of all, they share the universal habit of our species: They leave home because it is less desirable than the much richer U.S. and then want to change the U.S. to match the home they had to leave.  In Europe, its Moslem immigrants are even more overt about that and more violent as well, celebrating major holidays by burning people’s cars in the streets.

The Swiss are generally seen as pretty hard-headed folk, better grounded in reality than many. They have now settled upon controlling the numbers of people they will allow entry to their country, their ‘property.’ As a tiny place with only a few million people and with no great room for lots more, that seems to make sense, if the Swiss want to preserve the very decent lifestyle they have worked hard for centuries to make for themselves.

The U.S. has more room than Switzerland, but it cannot accept every impoverished Hispanic in the Americas who might wish to come. They only come because their home systems have failed in the same ways that the U.S. has succeeded. Their salvation lies in changing that at home, not in mobbing the U.S. So the realistic solution seems to be: Return to admitting those whose arrival benefits the U.S. rather than the Democrats and Republicans. It worked here for a long time; it was a big part of what built the place. America needs immigrants still, but immigrants who arrive legally and who come to contribute and to blend in, rather than those who come expecting subsidy and accommodation.

Most of all, Europe and America need leaders pursuing the interests of their countries rather than of themselves.

Advertisements

About Jack Curtis

Suspicious of government, doubtful of economics, fond of figure skating (but the off-ice part, not so much)
This entry was posted in Culture, Immigration, Politics and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Sound The Alarm! The Swiss Are Controlling Their Border! (Who Do They Think It BelongsTo, Anyway?)

  1. Well said.
    The Swiss have direct democracy so they can vote for what they want, whereas the rest of us have to accept with the politicians decide suits their strategy.

    • Jack Curtis says:

      Indeed! Perhaps we need an “eject” button, one that if pushed by enough of us on a given day, once or twice a year, would propel the selected politician out of office and into the nearest body of water … preferably, icy!

  2. I wish you have sharing buttons on your blog BTW. I wouild like to click a facebook or twitter share on quite a lot of your posts.

  3. More2Explore says:

    They say good walls make good neighbors, or something like that… but seriously, the Swiss are afforded the right to preserve their little island within the European continent. They can afford to do so with such a strong economy (~3% unemployment), but cannot neglect that 25% of it’s residents are foreign! Although it will take nearly 3 years to enact this as a law, there are business and economic implications beyond what the small majority of the people have approved. The Swiss people should be mindful that a detriment to their acceptance of foreigners will hurt their economy for the long term.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s