Boys And Girls: “Vive Le Difference!”

Guy Ogling GirlRecent thoughts of the precarious social position of the white American male elicited wider explorations of American males and females in general, the reality as opposed to the politically ‘correct’ conceptions. The reality is what we must live with, after all. This was triggered by a recent report from scientists who used eye-tracking equipment to define how each sex looked at a human female.

It turns out that as long assumed, male humans tend to check out a woman’s shape first, beginning with her bosom. This is assumed to be a biological imperative, for which we boys are both derided and forgiven; after all, we can’t help it. The reporters seemed–or at least, pretended–to be surprised, that the girls looked at other girls the same way. We suppose the surprise was a necessary sop to the Feminists because we all understand the intensely competitive nature of the human female in her need to select an appropriate father for her children. After all, that is her biological imperative. The male, the biological sexual aggressor, automatically checks out females, giving passing males much more casual notice. The female concentrates on her competition. That is the biological reality elucidated inarguably via science.

That’s a poke in the eye for male-female equality as exploited by the Feminists. They want to make men and women not so much equal, as equivalent and interchangeable. Two women then, must be equal to a man and a women as the homosexuals want it. But human biology doesn’t work that way and as eye-tracking shows, neither does human psychology. We aren’t designed to live like that. Nevertheless, we go charging ahead to compel it via government force. That reminds of the old saw that a camel is a horse provided by the government…

The problem is the one raised so clearly by George Orwell in his book “1084” wherein the government insisted that: “War is Peace” and “Freedom is Slavery” among other slogans. The same verbal prostitution has been applied to “rights” and “equality.” Men and women are not, never have been and likely never will be, equal. Size, skills and attitudes are not the same. They do have equal rights. Their common humanity is identical. Their minds and bodies, are thankfully, not.

Our society, seems to us, will work better if we recognize reality in ordering it, instead of trying to replace reality with scientifically invalid political games aimed at vote-garnering class warfare. We pay a lot for harboring such fallacies. And our kids pay an inordinate share of it.

So men and women aren’t equal, only their rights are. Each has a place unique to him or her that the other cannot fill. We are different. And: “Vive le difference!”

About Jack Curtis

Suspicious of government, doubtful of economics, fond of figure skating (but the off-ice part, not so much) Couple of degrees in government, a few medals in figure skating; just reading and suspicion for economics ...
This entry was posted in Class Warfare, Culture, Equality, Feminist and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Boys And Girls: “Vive Le Difference!”

  1. I think everyone looks at womens chests to determine the gender of the person they are interacting with.

    • Jack Curtis says:

      Hmnn … Risking self analysis here, (a substantial risk, too) I think that my reflexive glances follow an initial presumption of gender, more as verification/grading than as initial determination. Biology rules by acting before there is time to think!

      • You reveal your culture here. American ladies are generally unambiguous in their dress and have style! But I come from slobby, peasant Northern Ireland where the women dress like men to try and keep their filfthy hands off us. Also we are not a pretty people seeming to have all been cloned from the same pair of ugly mugs. In the circumstances looking at the chest is needed to avoid social gaffes like serving a woman who is next to be served instead of the man who has just entered the shop. (Don’t visit. It is a terrible place).
        After I posted the comment I thought, well, I suppose it is better than the only other alternative which would take longer scrutiny. In Northern Ireland, potentially for ever.

  2. Jack Curtis says:

    Well, if “style” is the word for it. Perhaps it has more to do with the assurance by retailers of a new guaranteed, minimum level of sales every year …

    I guess that the North and the rest of Ireland are still fighting the conflict resulting from the Reformation, maybe? And thus, stuck in those self-images?

    Recalling the Irish Catholics on one side of my family and the French Huguenots from the other, I can visualize how it might be.

  3. I’m afraid some of the parodies of peasants aren’t aways parodies. History? What’s that?

  4. Jack Curtis says:

    That depends perhpas, upon the selected historian?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s