What do you think of a high level public school behavioral specialist who is being prosecuted for preferring sex with a dog to sex with her own species? For me, it’s pathetic, sad, darkly funny and of course, outrageous. For many reasons. School Behavioral Specialist will link you with the details.
But it seems to me that with today’s legitimizing of gay marriage and abortion of our own species we should ask: What’s wrong with that, if she prefer it and the dog hasn’t complained?
If we can kill inconvenient nascent babies, we can’t also claim special status for human life. If we can legitimize gay sex via marriage, we can’t restrict human sexuality any more, the only honest basis for restriction was reproduction. It could as suggested above, be abuse of a pet but that would have to be proven, seems to me. And if the thought raises your gorge, do you have a right to punish others for your sensibilities? Your choice for a bedmate may repel our behavioral specialist, too…pale, hairless and maybe even without doggy breath! Nevertheless, she’s headed for a wholly legal lynching, I’ll bet. And if you’ve read the previous post, you know that at least some scientists likely believe her ‘needs’ are as much a result of a quirk of her brain as anything else. If they’re correct, who’s responsible? Who has the right to judge?
Why is she being lynched…excuse me, prosecuted? Well, I suppose mostly because she’s beyond the sexual norms the majority are comfortable with. Is it likely she was teaching school kids to love dogs? Dunno, but I doubt it. She’s just too different and for that, she has to hang. We’ve got past hanging folk for being black, but the pattern is still there in our genes, just now switched to non-race differences. That used to exclude religious differences too, but that’s been tossed now, as the Obamafolk attack on Catholics and Jews makes clear. By which this refers to mandating birth control and abortion onto Catholic institutions via Obamacare and ordering military chaplains to marry gays under penalty of courts martial.
So we or at least, our governors see these standards as subject to change as needed. They, apparently, will decide the need. That sort of thing raises my own gorge quicker than does a sexual fringe dweller’s harmless-to-humans practices.
Does this mean I’m approving bestiality? Hardly. It means I’m disapproving the hypocrisy of both our governors and our society. It is in the end, our own corruption that elects corrupt rulers and facilitates a corrupt society, is it not?