It Just Seems Curious…

Are You Sure You Want To Know?

I have no idea whether Barack Obama is a Constitutionally qualified President but the scene makes me very, very curious. He’s self-declared big on transparency but has paid millions to lawyers to prevent anyone getting the goods. As soon as anyone asks, the media plus both parties dump on her until she’s a small, damp blot in the news as it moves on. And they only do that when they can’t prevent publication to begin with.

What’s more curious is why he’s the only one in hiding; all the others run out into the streets waving birth certificates, tax returns, school records and everything but their wives’ latest weight. From the Obama’s, both lawyers who’ve ‘given up their law licenses’ it’s more the other way ’round. Or almost. Why would that be? Dunno, but it’s so different from any other Prez we’ve ever had that it’s curious.

All the pundits of both parties are very clear; it’s none of our business anyway. Well, ok then, why does the Constitution impose requirements? And if we can ignore those, can’t we then ignore whatever else in the Constitution we don’t like?

Ol’ Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse (retired police investigators and lawyers) said right out in public that the Hawaii Birth Certificate isn’t, it’s a computer-assembled fake. Guess they’re in big  trouble for that, right? Silence…no trouble, no lawsuit, nothing. More shoes to drop, per Sheriff Joe. Looking foreard to it. Of course, ol’ Joe didn’t present any of this until Obama went after him. So far, he’s way ahead of the Governor of Illinois…

Then there’s all those different Social Security numbers the Prez seems to have used, including the one they say was issued to an old guy now dead from a state where the Prez never lived. None of this has ever been denied apparently and it’s curious too, isn’t it?

Maybe Obama is an alien from space who had to be the first black President (well, white mom, Arab/Kenyan dad, so 1/4th black) so as to be able to paint over his normally green skin. Dunno that, either.

The most curious of all seems to me, how he uniquely gets a pass from all sides. Folks who can’t agree on a damn’ thing and half of whom want him out of office (or claim to) but all of whom immediately get hip-to-hip and attack anyone who raises the question. Like it’s not our business whom they pick to be our President, or something.

Just seems curious, to me…

About Jack Curtis

Suspicious of government, doubtful of economics, fond of figure skating (but the off-ice part, not so much)
This entry was posted in Barack Obama, Censorship, Conspiracy, Constitution, Corruption, Hypocrisy and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to It Just Seems Curious…

  1. ehancock says:

    The “he has paid millions” is a birther myth. Where did you get your figures? Can you even show a lawsuit against Obama just for records or just for his birth certificate and not to stop an election or to get Obama’s name off of a ballot?

    Obama has not shown his school transcripts, college transcripts, passports, baptism records (if any), medical records, Etc. But then NEITHER have the Republican candidates for president. Obama has shown his birth certificate–short form and long form—and he has shown his tax return for each year (Some Republican candidates have, but not all).

    Re Different social security numbers. The Birther press does not tell you but MILLIONS of people have errors in their Social Security numbers, and millions have multiple Social Security numbers.

    http://www.cnbc.com/id/38678753/How_Many_Social_Security_Numbers_Do_You_Have

    http://www.securityworldnews.com/2010/08/12/20-million-americans-have-multiple-social-security-numbers-associated-with-their-name/

    http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-501465_162-20013733-501465.html

    The Connecticut SS number was caused by a data entry error. SS numbers were generated by the zip code of the applicant’s address. Obama’s address in Hawaii was in zip code 96814, and the zip code for Danbury, CT. is 06814.

  2. jackcurtis says:

    Hmnn…can you force someone to produce a birth certificate by suing him? Didn’t know that…Obama’s widely reported attorney expenses are for preventing various local issuers from interfering with his privacy by publishing information, not for defending him as I get iit.
    The post is about what the Prez hasn’t produced, not about what various others may or may not have shown. The birth certificate published by the White House is the one the Sheriff’s experts found fraudulent; so far, nobody has been allowed to view the original documentation in Hawaii. Why, given the fuss, hasn’t the President simply allowed display in Hawaii of the original records? It just seems curious…

  3. ehancock says:

    Re: “Obama’s widely reported attorney expenses are for preventing various local issuers from interfering with his privacy by publishing information, not for defending him as I get iit.”

    There is not a single case of that. Not one case.

    Re: “he birth certificate published by the White House is the one the Sheriff’s experts found fraudulent..”

    Sure, by self-described “experts” who have not shown their expertise, and who certainly have not demonstrated that they are impartial.

    The following experts say that there is nothing wrong with Obama’s birth certificate, and the State of Hawaii, which is the real expert, has not said that there is anything wrong with it.

    Dr. Neil Krawetz, an imaging software analysis author and experienced examiner of questioned images, said: \ldblquote The PDF released by the White House shows no sign of digital manipulation or alterations. I see nothing that appears to be suspicious.

    Nathan Goulding with The National Review: We have received several e-mails today calling into question the validity of the PDF that the White House released, namely that there are embedded layers in the document. There are now several other people on the case. We looked into it and dismissed it. \’85 I\rquote ve confirmed that scanning an image, converting it to a PDF, optimizing that PDF, and then opening it up in Illustrator, does in fact create layers similar to what is seen in the birth certificate PDF. You can try it yourself at home.

    John Woodman, independent computer professional, said in a series of videos that the claims of fakery that he examined were unfounded.

    Ivan Zatkovich, who has testified in court as a technology expert, and consultant to WorldNetDaily: “All of the modifications to the PDF document that can be identified are consistent with someone enhancing the legibility of the document.”

    Other research on this:

    http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2012/03/book-review-a-question-of-eligibility/#more-16786

    http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2012/03/obama-conspiracy-theories-blog-launches-investigation-into-sheriff-joes-cold-case-posse/

    http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2012/03/decoding-the-long-form-part-1/

    http://www.thefogbow.com/arpaio-report/

    http://www.obamabirthbook.com/http:/www.obamabirthbook.com/2012/03/on-the-release-of-report-from-sheriff-joe-arpaio-stating-barack-obamas-birth-certificate-is-a-forgery/

    The DOH of Hawaii stated in a letter that she had seen the original birth certificate being copied onto security paper and that was the document that she gave to Obama’s lawyer. That physical copy was passed around in the White House press room and everyone there got a chance to hold it, and feel the seal. One reporter even photographed it

    Re: “Why, given the fuss, hasn’t the President simply allowed display in Hawaii of the original records? ”

    Hawaii regulations do not allow it to display birth certificates to anyone. They can only send out copies to the people who are eligible to receive them and those people can display the birth certificates. The officials in Hawaii have stated in writing that they did send a birth certificate to Obama, and that it was accurate, and they have said repeatedly that the facts on Obama’s short-form and long-form birth certificate are accurate. And the fact that Obama had a Hawaii birth certificate in 1961 is further confirmed by the birth notices in the Hawaii newspapers, which in those days were only sent to the papers by the DOH of Hawaii (the papers in Hawaii did not accept birth notices from relatives for that section of the paper), and the DOH of Hawaii in 1961 only sent out birth notices for children born in Hawaii.

    • jackcurtis says:

      Thank you for all the information.
      Supporters have amassed experts and officials helping the President’s cause, rather obliquely as to the officials. Why don’t they just get up in public and swear that they know from the official records that he was born in Hawaii…it would be so much simpler, seems to me.

      Quetioners have amassed experts too and the two groups of experts disagree…not so unusual among such. But not very helpful to the rest of us.

      We’re told the story of attorney fees gone to lock away the President’s records is false but the records are somehow unavailable anyway…we’re reminded that some Republicans haven’t released their records, some have; sounds likely but none are identified. Doesn’t matter, we’re here only for the President’s case since he’s the President.

      If the President would just authorize release and publication this would all go away, seems to me. Insead, we’re given all sorts of stuff about why we should believe what we’re told without seeing the evidence. We used to call that, buying a pig in a pole.
      It does seem curious…

  4. ehancock says:

    Re: “Why don’t they just get up in public and swear that they know from the official records that he was born in Hawaii…it would be so much simpler, seems to me. ”

    They have stated it in writing several times that the birth certificate says exactly what Obama’s birth certificate shows.

    Neither Obama nor anyone can “authorize the release” of a Hawaii birth certificate. There is nothing in Hawaii law that allows the DOH of Hawaii to issue a birth certificate or show a birth certificate to anyone other than on the official list of people who can receive it (the person and relatives mainly). It can be sent to this list, and only to this list. It cannot be released to you or me or the general public. The principle is that the person who has received the birth certificate can release it. AND THAT IS WHAT HAPPENED. Obama released his birth certificate twice, the officials in Hawaii confirmed the facts on it. The fact that he had a birth certificate in 1961 is further confirmed by the birth notices in the Hawaii newspapers in that year, which at the time were only sent to the papers by the DOH of Hawaii, and only sent for births IN HAWAII.

    IN CONTRAST, none of the Republican candidates for president has shown his birth certificate AT ALL. Why the doubt about Obama and the lack of doubt about the Republicans? The fact that birthers who hate Obama continue to make claims is not a good explanation. Naturally they will continue to make claims; they hate Obama. Some of them in the past have even lied and said that Obama’s Kenyan grandmother said he was born in Kenya (she said repeatedly in the taped interview that Obama was born in Hawaii, and she said in another interview, with the Hartford Courant newspaper, that the first that her family in Kenya had heard of Obama’s birth was IN A LETTER FROM HAWAII.

    You know, if there were a shred of anything that could be believed in the birther claims, they would be getting support from Ann Coulter, Glenn Beck and the National Review. But Coulter, Beck and O’Reilly all have said that birthers are crazy, and the National Review points out the obvious fact that the Sheriff is hardly an impartial law enforcement officer.

  5. jackcurtis says:

    Seems we’ve covered it.
    I can’t obtain info that seems applicable about a guy we”ve hired to run the country, info most ordinary employers want.
    The original birth certificate remains invisible, we’re told that the controversial White House version is to be believed and also that it is fraudulent. Some Hawaii folk said they sent the Prez a copy and that the info he published agrees with that sent. Nobody of Hawaii officialdom has sworn that the records show he was born there. Or not. All speech very lawyerly and oblique, to me.
    You want a public job, you tell the public what it wants to know, seems to me. Our President has not done that, that I can see. And it just seems curious…particularly, from a guy who’s now going to help himself to everything he wants to know about me plus access to my bank account and hasn’t promised privacy. (ObamaCare)

  6. katie says:

    It hardly matters anyway….jfk last president we had.

Leave a Reply to jackcurtis Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s